finance article No.8519
Fatties Not Fit For Life Insurance
[Some words in this document worrying old three time enter 11 Obesity health problems liver even cancer 127 now companies make fatties Body Mass tool calculate person normal proportions figure cent higher past serious Britain obesity might still heading mark high-risk smoker certain 400 example 000 cover 55-year man non-smoker him his 25-year policy 500 pounds second largest Norwich raise premium costs insurer BMI new pay director understand poor diet lack realise overweight life insurance expensive stay backs charge claiming Problems convince due building solid obese point economical asks catches Ombudsman constantly throws cases rejected reason Recently 37 foot 16 died blood clot was nine 275 true details put form couldn mistake Matt ideal insurers clients Prudential help offers ]
A worrying fact is that a quarter of children are classed as overweight before they are old enough to start school. That figure is one in three by the time they enter secondary school at the age of 11. Obesity can be related to a range of health problems including diabetes, heart and liver disease and even cancer. In less than a decade since 1999 the number of doctors' prescriptions for obesity drugs rose from 127,000 to more than a million. And now the insurance companies are going to make the fatties pay. The Body Mass Index (BMI) is the tool used to calculate whether a person is of 'normal' proportions, or 'overweight', or 'obese', which is anyone with a BMI of over 30. This is the figure at which many insurance companies start charging up to 50 per cent higher premiums. In the past a BMI nearer 40 was used, but as it became clear how serious Britain's obesity problem was, the figure was lowered to 30. However, they might decide to drop lower still, heading closer to the 25 mark where the 'overweight' category starts. If you are obese and also have other high-risk factors such as being a smoker or suffering from certain medical conditions, the increase in the cost of your premiums could soar to a staggering 400 per cent! An example for 150,000 pounds of life cover for a 55-year old man in good health, who is a non-smoker of normal weight, is about 1,000 pounds a year. Let him become obese and his 25-year policy could cost him 500 pounds more. Not all insurance companies use the same BMI rate. The second largest insurer, Norwich Union, uses 35 as the figure at which to raise the premium costs, and the third largest, Friends Provident, goes from 33. Legal & General, Britain's leading insurer, uses a BMI of 30, and said that 13 per cent of new customers would have to pay the higher premiums. L&G's director of underwriting and claims, Russ Whitworth said, "Most
people understand that poor diet and lack of exercise can lead to health problems but they might not realise that being significantly overweight would also make their life insurance more expensive. "Although it is not an exact science, we find that BMI is the best indicator of the risk of being overweight, so it pays to stay in shape." The Association of British Insurers backs its members' decision to charge higher premiums for the obese, claiming that it is no different from charging more for a smoker or somebody with a previous medical condition Problems could arise for super-fit sportsmen who would have to convince their insurers that their high BMI score is due to building up solid muscle rather than being obese. It's no point being economical with the truth when an application form asks for your height and weight. In the event of a claim, the company won't pay out if it catches you out in a lie. The Financial Ombudsman Service says it constantly throws out cases where a claim has been rejected for this reason. Recently a man of 37 claimed on his application to be six foot tall and to weigh 16 stone. When he died of a blood clot five months later it turned out he was only 5 foot nine inches tall and five stone heavier. Needless to say there was no pay out. His premiums would have increased by 275 per cent if his true details had been known, but his claim would have been valid. The Financial Ombudsman ruled that there was such a difference between what he put on the form and what he actually measured that it couldn't have been a mistake. Matt Morris, a policy adviser at specialist financial advisers Life Search, explained, " In an ideal world, insurers want the healthier clients. There is an element of cherry picking. They don't want the burden of the heavier client." The Prudential is doing something to help. It now offers free gym membership, and if you use it at least twice a week you get a 2.25 per cent discount as well.
This document is made by wendang from a free article Please see its Term Of Use
Article Source: www.ArticlesBase.com The link of the article:http://www.articlesbase.com/finance-articles/fatties-not-fit-forlife-insurance-795520.html
All Documents-Documents in This Collection-Most Viewed Documents-Documents about Loan-Love
[all 319 words in this document] 000 1 11 127 13 150 16 1999 25 25-year 275 30 33 35 37 40 400 500 55-year about actually adviser advisers age also although amp an and anyone application are arise as asks association backs be became become been before being best between blood bmi body britain british building burden but by calculate can cancer cases catches category cent certain charge charging cherry children claim claimed claiming claims classed clear client clients closer clot companies company condition conditions constantly convince cost costs could couldn cover customers decade decide decision details diabetes died diet difference different director discount disease doctors doing don drop drugs due economical element enough enter even event exact example exercise expensive explained fact factors fatties figure financial find five foot form free friends from general get goes going good gym had has have heading health healthier heart heavier height help high high-risk higher him his how however ideal inches including increase increased index indicator insurance insurer insurers its known lack largest later lead leading least legal less let life liver lower lowered make man many mark mass matt measured medical members membership might million mistake months more morris most muscle nearer needless new nine non-smoker normal norwich not number obese obesity of offers old ombudsman only other overweight past pay pays people per person picking point policy poor pounds premium premiums prescriptions previous problem problems proportions provident prudential put quarter raise range rate rather realise reason recently rejected related rose ruled russ said same say says school science score search second secondary serious service shape significantly since six soar solid somebody something specialist sportsmen staggering start starts stay still stone such suffering super-fit tall than that their there they third this three throws time tool true truth turned twice understand underwriting union use used uses valid want was week well what when where whether which whitworth who with won world worrying would you your